Sipsa Labs · Enterprise

Run frontier models on your own infrastructure.

Bit-identical reproducibility. SHA-256 verifiable. SOC 2 / SR-11-7 / FDA / DoD-ready architecture. Deploy compressed Hermes-3-405B, Mixtral-8x22B, Llama-3.1-70B, and Qwen3-235B-A22B on your hardware — under your security boundary, under your audit log.

22 architectures shipped 14 fully PPL-verified SHA-256 bit-identical OpenAI-compatible SDK BUSL-1.1 + commercial license
/ Deployment paths

Three ways to deploy inside your boundary.

Pick the lane that matches your security posture and procurement model. Every path delivers the same compressed substrate — same SHA-256 manifest, same OpenAI-compatible endpoint, same verifier.

Path 1

On-Prem MSA

Install the compressed substrate inside your firewall. Runs in your VPC, your bare-metal cluster, or your private cloud. SHA-256 attestation per artifact. BUSL-1.1 source license plus a commercial deployment grant for your workload, vendor, and subsidiary scope.

For: Fortune 500 ML platform teams, banks, healthcare AI, regulated SaaS.
$250K — $1.5M / year
Discuss on-prem →
Path 2

Air-Gapped Deploy

For DoD, classified, and regulated bond environments. Offline reconstruction from signed manifests — the runtime never reaches the public internet. FedRAMP-ready architecture. Delivered via signed media or via your authorized cross-domain solution.

For: defense primes, intelligence community, ITAR-controlled programs, classified research labs.
Pricing on request
Discuss air-gapped →
Path 3

Compression-as-a-Service

Bring your fine-tuned model. We compress it to your spec and return a customer-side reproducible artifact — bit-identical, SHA-256-verifiable, served by the same runtime as your stock models. You keep the artifact. Lawyer-reviewed contract for engagements above $50K.

For: in-house fine-tunes, internal foundation models, customer-specific architectures under MNDA.
$5K — $50K per architecture
Scope a job →
/ Compliance & verification

Verifiable today. Auditable by your team.

We're explicit about what's live, what's a target, and what the architecture supports today. No carrying-on, no bullet-point inflation. Compliance certifications below describe Sipsa Labs' attestation status — the deployment architecture is designed to fit inside your controls regardless.

Control Status What this means for you
SHA-256 bit-identical reconstruction Live today Every artifact ships with a signed manifest. Your security team runs uc verify and confirms byte-for-byte equivalence to the source weights independently.
SR-11-7 model risk management Architecture supports today Bit-identical reconstruction means the model under risk-management review is the same model in production — no separate "compressed-variant" governance lane required. Self-attestation provided.
FDA SaMD architecture fit Architecture supports today For Software-as-a-Medical-Device pipelines, the deterministic reconstruction contract preserves model identity through the validation pipeline. Phase II clinical-trial proposals require a separate IRB engagement.
SOC 2 Type 1 Q3 2026 target Audit firm engaged. Type 1 expected in Q3 2026; Type 2 follows once the observation window completes.
HIPAA-managed BAA Q3 2026 target Required for the managed inference path. Customers running the on-prem deploy keep PHI inside their own boundary today — no PHI ever reaches Sipsa Labs infrastructure.
FedRAMP 2027 target Air-gapped deploy is the bridge in the meantime — the runtime fits inside an existing FedRAMP boundary your IL4/IL5 environment already operates.

Compliance status is reviewed quarterly. We will not claim a certification we don't hold — if your procurement requires a specific control on a specific date, email founder@sipsalabs.com for the current attestation letter and roadmap.

/ What you get

Same SDK. Same code path. Half the GPUs.

Enterprise engagements include the same substrate that ships on PyPI — plus the contractual envelope, deployment support, and architecture coverage your platform team needs.

/ The pitch in 3 bullets

For your CFO and your CTO.

Three things make this different from every other "model compression" pitch you've seen. Each is verifiable on your hardware before you sign anything.

Smaller weights at the same task quality

5× fewer GPUs for the same throughput, or the same GPUs serve 5× the load. Quality is verified per architecture — published PPL ratio between 1.0026× and 1.0200× against the bf16 baseline.

=

Bit-identical reconstruction

No need to re-validate the model in your audit pipeline — it's the same model, byte-for-byte, after dequantization. SR-11-7, FDA SaMD, and internal model-governance reviews carry through without a parallel "compressed-variant" lane.

Public verifier

Your security team audits the codec independently with pip install ultracompress && uc verify. The verification path is open and reproducible — you don't have to take our word for any claim on this page.

/ Get started

Talk to the founder.

We don't have a CRM funnel yet — one email, the founder reads it. Include your use case, expected scale (GPU count and token throughput), and your security boundary (on-prem, VPC, air-gapped). 24-hour reply on enterprise inquiries.

Email founder@sipsalabs.com

Reference customer needed for procurement? We will line up a direct conversation between your team and a current design partner under mutual NDA — mention “reference request” in the subject line.

Start the conversation
24-hour reply · Direct from founder · NDAs accepted